Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive210% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7  (all builds)
Memory29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '18 at 23:43
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Memory 78.9
1-Core 116
2-Core 233
79% 142 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 804
75% 625 Pts
64-Core 1,276
79% 1,276 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 144
Parallax 124
110% 134 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 138
Splatting 109
98% 121 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1260 341 299 301 300 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
210% Outstanding
Read 1,570
Write 1,322
Mixed 1,080
SusWrite 467
248% 1,110 MB/s
4K Read 56.6
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 74.7
250% 87 MB/s
DQ Read 971
DQ Write 883
DQ Mixed 926
695% 927 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 210%
Great: 280%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
26GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 505
Write 488
Mixed 400
104% 464 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 58.4
201% 71.2 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 357
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 168 162 170 171 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 183
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 168
98% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.5
144% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2400C16-8GFX F4-2133C15-8GFX F4-2400C16-8GFX F4-2133C15-8GFX 32GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
MC Read 38.4
MC Write 36.8
MC Mixed 33.6
104% 36.3 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 35.7
SC Mixed 29.5
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $826
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback