Asrock B85M Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive35.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsrock B85M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20131206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 26 '19 at 14:32
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4430-$124
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 95
2-Core 188
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 356
48% 357 Pts
64-Core 353
22% 353 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
319GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 259 251 240 250 271 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.4% Below average
Read 194
Write 97.4
Mixed 81.9
SusWrite 248
35% 155 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 17.8
4K Mixed 9.6
39% 12.9 MB/s
DQ Read 13.3
DQ Write 16.1
DQ Mixed 14.1
11% 14.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
324GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 111 111 113 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 117
Write 107
Mixed 69.1
SusWrite 112
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-476.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.8% Below average
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 8.9
27% 9.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,267 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B85M Pro4 - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $387
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback