TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus ROG STRIX Z390-H GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 141%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 144%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive304% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-H GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191024
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 24 '19 at 00:50
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 96.6
1-Core 156
2-Core 304
102% 186 Pts
4-Core 594
8-Core 1,105
101% 849 Pts
64-Core 1,664
103% 1,664 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑
This bench: 104%
 Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
MSI(1462 372D)
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
134% Outstanding
Lighting 185
Reflection 179
Parallax 178
151% 181 fps
MRender 204
Gravity 165
Splatting 115
127% 161 fps
Poor: 116% ↑
This bench: 134%
 Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2146 877 813 812 813 810 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
304% Outstanding
Read 2,559
Write 2126
Mixed 1,482
SusWrite 1,045
402% 1,803 MB/s
4K Read 63.4
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 87
286% 99.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,104
DQ Write 1,063
DQ Mixed 981
765% 1,049 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑
This bench: 304%
 Great: 340%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
465GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 478 482 483 450 364 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 479
Mixed 428
SusWrite 452
105% 467 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 91.5
4K Mixed 55.9
184% 63.2 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 355
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑
This bench: 121%
 Great: 129%
PNY CS3030 500GB SSD
316GB free
Firmware: CS303225
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1988 749 495 491 493 496 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 821
Write 1,999
Mixed 1,157
SusWrite 786
271% 1,191 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 70.7
235% 87.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,131
DQ Write 1,120
DQ Mixed 1,124
845% 1,125 MB/s
Poor: 119% ↑
This bench: 204%
 Great: 266%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
873GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 176 178 178 178 178 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 179
Mixed 112
SusWrite 177
121% 165 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
235% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 106%
 Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 39.9
MC Write 40.8
MC Mixed 30.6
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 46.8
SC Mixed 31.5
95% 33.4 GB/s
Latency 51.9
77% 51.9 ns
Poor: 66% ↑
This bench: 105%
 Great: 131%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical ROG STRIX Z390-H GAMING Builds (Compare 3,753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-H GAMING - $192

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel  $264Bench 97%, 550,833 samples1,097x
Core i9-9900KIntel  $399Bench 98%, 354,223 samples899x
Core i5-9600KIntel  $137Bench 93%, 321,194 samples582x
GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia  $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples293x
RTX 2080Nvidia  $270Bench 124%, 316,424 samples236x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia  $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples234x
SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples189x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples168x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples152x
RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples115x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples112x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples105x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $725
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback