TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus ROG STRIX Z390-H GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 148%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics137% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive301% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-H GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 17 '19 at 17:46
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 95.9
1-Core 158
2-Core 317
104% 190 Pts
4-Core 636
8-Core 1,230
111% 933 Pts
64-Core 1,636
101% 1,636 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑
This bench: 107%
 Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
MSI(1462 372D)
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Lighting 192
Reflection 184
Parallax 195
157% 190 fps
MRender 201
Gravity 160
Splatting 112
124% 158 fps
Poor: 116% ↑
This bench: 137%
 Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
413GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2089 808 810 810 831 815 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
301% Outstanding
Read 2,555
Write 2,395
Mixed 1,652
SusWrite 1,027
427% 1,908 MB/s
4K Read 62.9
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 86.3
285% 99.6 MB/s
DQ Read 983
DQ Write 1,125
DQ Mixed 970
754% 1,026 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑
This bench: 301%
 Great: 340%
PNY CS3030 500GB SSD
465GB free
Firmware: CS303225
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1949 904 494 493 493 495 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 901
Write 1,115
Mixed 1,146
SusWrite 805
224% 992 MB/s
4K Read 49.5
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 69.7
244% 90.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,148
DQ Write 1,137
DQ Mixed 1,106
841% 1,130 MB/s
Poor: 119% ↑
This bench: 211%
 Great: 266%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
465GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 473 481 484 456 364 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 482
Mixed 438
SusWrite 451
106% 471 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 89.2
4K Mixed 55.8
182% 62.4 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 356
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑
This bench: 121%
 Great: 129%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
731GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 171 173 172 173 173 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 165
Mixed 110
SusWrite 172
117% 159 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
241% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 103%
 Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 38.6
MC Mixed 30
101% 35.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 45.2
SC Mixed 30.3
93% 32.6 GB/s
Latency 54.4
74% 54.4 ns
Poor: 66% ↑
This bench: 101%
 Great: 131%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical ROG STRIX Z390-H GAMING Builds (Compare 3,753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-H GAMING - $192

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel  $264Bench 97%, 550,833 samples1,097x
Core i9-9900KIntel  $399Bench 98%, 354,223 samples899x
Core i5-9600KIntel  $137Bench 93%, 321,194 samples582x
GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia  $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples293x
RTX 2080Nvidia  $270Bench 124%, 316,424 samples236x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia  $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples234x
SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples189x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples168x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples152x
RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples115x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples112x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples105x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $725
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback