Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 18 '19 at 16:32
Run Duration280 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Memory 76.9
1-Core 153
2-Core 303
95% 178 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 873
88% 713 Pts
64-Core 1,112
69% 1,112 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Zotac(19DA 1425) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2520 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 148
Parallax 123
104% 133 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 126
Splatting 106
94% 116 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid KINGSTON SH103S3 120GB
110GB free
Firmware: 526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 164 164 166 166 163 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 318
Write 197
Mixed 224
SusWrite 167
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 8.2
4K Mixed 7.4
25% 7.67 MB/s
DQ Read 7.3
DQ Write 8.5
DQ Mixed 7.8
6% 7.87 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 59%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GB
348GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1588 863 733 781 743 755 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 1,507
Write 2,213
Mixed 1,634
SusWrite 910
354% 1,566 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 11.5
148% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 9.2
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 75
58% 75.3 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 160%
Great: 298%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 860 500GB
355GB free
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 322 322 322 322 321 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 465
Write 406
Mixed 423
SusWrite 336
92% 407 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 53
4K Mixed 31.7
102% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 24.4
DQ Write 56.2
DQ Mixed 32.9
27% 37.8 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 98%
Amd-raid KINGSTON SA400S3 480GB
443GB free
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 201 205 205 208 246 MB/s
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.2% Average
Read 265
Write 199
Mixed 183
SusWrite 232
49% 220 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 32.1
4K Mixed 15.6
61% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 11.8
DQ Write 26.9
DQ Mixed 14.8
13% 17.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 69%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 850 250GB
113GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 318 318 318 317 317 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 455
Write 410
Mixed 358
SusWrite 329
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 51.6
4K Mixed 31.8
111% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 25.6
DQ Write 54.9
DQ Mixed 33.8
28% 38.1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 101%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0911
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 184 185 181 180 185 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 135
Write 116
Mixed 79.9
SusWrite 179
93% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 97%
USB DISK 2.0 1GB
1GB free, PID 3600
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 5.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
6.43% Terrible
Read 20.9
Write 6
Mixed 6
SusWrite 6.3
11% 9.8 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
35% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.43%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.7% Very good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 28.4
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 27.4
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 86.4
46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,884 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $937
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback