Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 17 '19 at 16:51
Run Duration839 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Memory 75
1-Core 153
2-Core 302
94% 177 Pts
4-Core 600
8-Core 881
92% 741 Pts
64-Core 876
54% 876 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 92%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GB
353GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1543 944 943 947 917 953 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 1,444
Write 2,517
Mixed 1,652
SusWrite 1,041
377% 1,663 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 71.2
240% 86.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,104
DQ Write 791
DQ Mixed 1,009
737% 968 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 238%
Great: 298%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 860 500GB
355GB free
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 323 320 322 320 320 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 440
Write 399
Mixed 407
SusWrite 334
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 49.9
4K Mixed 29.8
97% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 88.7
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 108
90% 127 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 98%
Amd-raid KINGSTON SA400S3 480GB
443GB free
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 177 197 199 208 209 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 399
Write 240
Mixed 305
SusWrite 215
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 43.2
4K Mixed 21.4
76% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 74.1
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 80.8
75% 113 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 69%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 850 250GB
113GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 318 318 317 316 317 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 436
Write 393
Mixed 344
SusWrite 328
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 30
102% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 92.9
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 109
91% 128 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 101%
Amd-raid KINGSTON SH103S3 120GB
110GB free
Firmware: 526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 166 165 164 165 166 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
139% Outstanding
Read 314
Write 186
Mixed 216
SusWrite 168
164% 221 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 7
1,203% 7.07 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 139%
Great: 140%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0911
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 182 182 182 181 180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Read 151
Write 147
Mixed 81.6
SusWrite 179
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 97%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 152 158 161 162 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 102
Write 105
Mixed 35.1
SusWrite 158
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 0.8
242% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 75%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.7% Very good
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 29.1
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 27.8
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $973
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback