Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive135% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 17 '19 at 21:52
Run Duration294 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
90% Outstanding
Memory 75.4
1-Core 154
2-Core 305
94% 178 Pts
4-Core 561
8-Core 876
89% 718 Pts
64-Core 1,097
68% 1,097 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 90%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Zotac(19DA 1425) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 148
Parallax 134
105% 137 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 126
Splatting 106
94% 116 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid KINGSTON SH103S3 120GB
110GB free
Firmware: 526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 163 167 160 168 167 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 328
Write 192
Mixed 222
SusWrite 164
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 8.2
4K Mixed 7.6
26% 7.8 MB/s
DQ Read 7.3
DQ Write 8.6
DQ Mixed 7.8
6% 7.9 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 59%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GB
350GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2086 748 630 806 907 759 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 459
Write 2,348
Mixed 376
SusWrite 989
239% 1,043 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 46
170% 66.6 MB/s
DQ Read 32.5
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 48.2
48% 74.2 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 135%
Great: 298%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 860 500GB
355GB free
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 323 321 322 318 319 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 466
Write 414
Mixed 425
SusWrite 334
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 53.5
4K Mixed 32.2
107% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 24.8
DQ Write 56.7
DQ Mixed 33.2
28% 38.2 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 98%
Amd-raid KINGSTON SA400S3 480GB
443GB free
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 192 262 256 195 333 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.5% Below average
Read 132
Write 88.4
Mixed 75
SusWrite 260
31% 139 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 17.4
4K Mixed 8.1
33% 11.4 MB/s
DQ Read 5.4
DQ Write 12.6
DQ Mixed 6.9
6% 8.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 69%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 850 250GB
113GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 317 318 317 315 316 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 456
Write 415
Mixed 364
SusWrite 327
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 32.2
112% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 26
DQ Write 56.3
DQ Mixed 32.6
27% 38.3 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 101%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0911
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 181 184 184 177 174 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 151
Mixed 79.7
SusWrite 178
104% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 97%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 157 156 158 156 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 101
Write 126
Mixed 32.9
SusWrite 156
75% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.8
249% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 28.8
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 27.5
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 89.4
45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,884 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $938
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback