Lenovo 10US000DIX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10US000DIX  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 313D
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180531
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 17 '19 at 22:20
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400T-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 92.5
1-Core 100
2-Core 198
76% 130 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 565
60% 479 Pts
64-Core 566
35% 566 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Legend(17AA 313D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
6.6% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 10.8
Parallax 7
6% 8.19 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 6.23
Splatting 14.8
9% 9.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.6%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
528GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 50 89 100 98 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 75.5
Write 120
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 83.4
62% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
94% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 71%
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250G 250GB
212GB free, PID 0611
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 39 40 37 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 34.7
Write 36.5
Mixed 34.8
SusWrite 38.7
50% 36.2 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 16.7
4K Mixed 13.9
1,086% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 14.1
DQ Write 20.1
DQ Mixed 16.3
1,290% 16.8 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 171%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (98th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.3% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 12.2
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 13.6
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 63.1
63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback