Asus PRIME X570-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics99.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive290% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-P  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '22 at 16:09
Run Duration286 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 68
1-Core 139
2-Core 277
86% 161 Pts
4-Core 535
8-Core 961
90% 748 Pts
64-Core 1,478
92% 1,478 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 84%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
Asus(1043 870E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.6% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 108
Parallax 122
98% 117 fps
MRender 175
Gravity 112
Splatting 100
102% 129 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1079 824 804 795 769 739 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
290% Outstanding
Read 2641
Write 2,555
Mixed 1882
SusWrite 835
442% 1,978 MB/s
4K Read 68.6
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 90.8
302% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,088
DQ Write 660
DQ Mixed 869
649% 872 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 290%
Great: 355%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
127GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 323 322 322 321 323 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 449
Mixed 450
SusWrite 334
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 90.9
4K Mixed 54.3
180% 62.1 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 198
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 106%
Great: 129%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
210GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 149 149 149 148 149 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 83.7
Write 100
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 148
71% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 112%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 2TB
754GB free
Firmware: 0508
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 92 94 94 95 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 118
Write 84
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 92
66% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
114% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 102%
WD My Book 25ED 8TB
7.5TB free, PID 25ed
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 211 213 216 208 207 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 204
Mixed 154
SusWrite 210
262% 192 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 1.6
383% 4.7 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 4.4
DQ Mixed 2
220% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 104%
Great: 95%
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250G 250GB
232GB free, PID 0611
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 238 237 236 225 225 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 243
Write 242
Mixed 226
SusWrite 233
323% 236 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 26.2
4K Mixed 22.3
1,722% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 20.6
DQ Write 26.4
DQ Mixed 23.3
1,767% 23.4 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 171%
Great: 171%
WD My Book 25EE 4TB
126GB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 130 131 131 130 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 124
Write 131
Mixed 104
SusWrite 131
168% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
126% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.6% Good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 27.2
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 24.9
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X570-P Builds (Compare 8,029 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $833
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback