Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 65% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	56% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	309% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	56.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190715
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Dec 15 '19 at 01:09
Run Duration	253 Seconds
Run User	SRB-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$403 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Memory 92.1 1-Core 150 2-Core 300 99% 181 Pts	4-Core 599 8-Core 1,139 103% 869 Pts	64-Core 1,647 102% 1,647 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 854A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.41 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	56% Above average	Lighting 70.8 Reflection 72 Parallax 61.6 58% 68.1 fps	MRender 62.1 Gravity 65.6 Splatting 64.7 53% 64.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88 85,928 User benchmarks, average bench 279% 521GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0118C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1173 881 885 845 847 839 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	309% Outstanding	Read 2,593 Write 1,500 Mixed 935 SusWrite 912 328% 1,485 MB/s	4K Read 66 4K Write 184 4K Mixed 91.1 314% 114 MB/s	DQ Read 1,327 DQ Write 1,010 DQ Mixed 510 560% 949 MB/s
Poor: 175% ↑ This bench: 309% Great: 372%
Apacer AS2280P2 480GB 129 User benchmarks, average bench 140% 441GB free Firmware: AP120PG0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 951 951 736 509 509 518 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	172% Outstanding	Read 739 Write 940 Mixed 787 SusWrite 696 179% 790 MB/s	4K Read 44.9 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 55.1 204% 74.7 MB/s	DQ Read 947 DQ Write 743 DQ Mixed 835 628% 842 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 172% Great: 192%
WD Purple Surveillance 2TB (2017)-$70 11,781 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 145 147 148 148 146 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	83.3% Excellent	Read 144 Write 145 Mixed 72 SusWrite 146 93% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 104%
WD Purple Surveillance 4TB (2017)-$73 8,846 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 179 179 180 179 178 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 175 Write 158 Mixed 79 SusWrite 178 108% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.1 213% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 113%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 272GB free Firmware: JB0OA3J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 101 103 103 103 103 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	54.2% Above average	Read 87 Write 93.5 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 102 55% 76.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 75%
SAMSUNG HM320II 320GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 32GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	18.9% Very poor	Read 35.5 Write 18.5 Mixed 31.2 SusWrite 37.1 41% 30.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 19%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB 14,954 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 308GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 110 110 110 110 110 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	41.1% Average	Read 76.2 Write 55.7 Mixed 49.5 SusWrite 109 99% 72.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend JM2666HLB-16G JM2666HLB-16G TS2GLH64V6B Adata 64GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	86.7% Excellent	MC Read 31.3 MC Write 33.1 MC Mixed 27 87% 30.5 GB/s	SC Read 19.7 SC Write 37 SC Mixed 27.5 80% 28.1 GB/s	Latency 63.9 63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 86.7% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,325 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $193Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	1,518x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	837x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	574x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	402x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	346x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	343x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	116x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	105x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	97x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	146x
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	91x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	84x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $650

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16