Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics50.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-PRO/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime6.3 Days
Run DateDec 08 '19 at 12:27
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$121
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Memory 95.2
1-Core 122
2-Core 248
88% 155 Pts
4-Core 501
8-Core 749
78% 625 Pts
64-Core 755
47% 755 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 36BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1578 MHz, MLim: 1917 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.6% Above average
Lighting 60.1
Reflection 73.6
Parallax 63.3
49% 65.7 fps
MRender 80.7
Gravity 59.1
Splatting 60
54% 66.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 120GB-$79
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 116 115 130 124 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 387
Write 138
Mixed 174
SusWrite 122
45% 206 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 93.6
4K Mixed 40
154% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 104
94% 144 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 79%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
48GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 480 480 483 479 472 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 490
Mixed 368
SusWrite 479
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 58.7
204% 72.4 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 331
255% 348 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 129%
Great: 124%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
210GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 135 134 135 135 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 155
Write 162
Mixed 37
SusWrite 134
88% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT8G4D26AFTA.16FAD 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2669 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.5% Very good
MC Read 37.8
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 20.5
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 22.4
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 56.6
71% 56.6 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 487 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $1,169
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback