Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics52.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-PRO/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateNov 04 '19 at 16:58
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Memory 95.4
1-Core 127
2-Core 259
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 763
79% 638 Pts
64-Core 758
47% 758 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 36BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1578 MHz, MLim: 1892 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.8
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Lighting 63.5
Reflection 74.3
Parallax 64.4
52% 67.4 fps
MRender 80
Gravity 60.3
Splatting 59.7
54% 66.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 120GB-$79
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 93 92 92 94 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 377
Write 124
Mixed 194
SusWrite 93.9
43% 197 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 96.5
4K Mixed 40.8
153% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 96.2
DQ Mixed 113
94% 138 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 79%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115
45GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 481 479 485 486 477 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 459
Mixed 366
SusWrite 482
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 55.2
198% 70.5 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 329
254% 347 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 127%
Great: 124%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
355GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 157 160 159 159 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 152
Write 148
Mixed 34.4
SusWrite 158
89% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
141% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 89%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT8G4D26AFTA.16FAD 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2672 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.2% Very good
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 20.7
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 22
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 55.8
72% 55.8 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 483 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $1,193
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback