Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-PRO/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime6.7 Days
Run DateNov 17 '19 at 12:18
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-5820K-$220
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
86.3% Excellent
1-Core 124
2-Core 249
87% 186 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 704
77% 598 Pts
64-Core 734
49% 734 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$428
Gigabyte(1458 36BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1578 MHz, MLim: 1917 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Lighting 180
Reflection 191
Parallax 202
47% 191 fps
MRender 168
Gravity 177
Splatting 138
52% 161 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 56%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 120GB-$89
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 125 128 134 125 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 433
Write 139
Mixed 194
SusWrite 124
49% 223 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 97.3
4K Mixed 37.9
155% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 113
95% 141 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 79%
Great: 78%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$224
45GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 480 476 483 481 482 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 490
Mixed 370
SusWrite 481
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 58.7
199% 69.9 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 330
254% 347 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 127%
Great: 125%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
355GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 154 156 157 157 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 147
Write 157
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 156
89% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
128% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 87%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BLT8G4D26AFTA.16FAD 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2669 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
75% Very good
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 20.9
76% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 22.4
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 56.5
71% 56.5 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75%
Great: 94%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,377 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $1,261
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $43
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $643SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback