Asus CM6870

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	56.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus CM6870 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK CM6870
Memory	25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120224
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Nov 30 '19 at 20:57
Run Duration	256 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	35%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	Memory 84.7 1-Core 102 2-Core 189 73% 125 Pts	4-Core 317 8-Core 476 49% 396 Pts	64-Core 483 30% 483 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7770 38,053 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Asus(1043 043B) 2GB CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.9.2 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Lighting 18.3 Reflection 16.9 Parallax 22.7 15% 19.3 fps	MRender 14.1 Gravity 17.2 Splatting 19 14% 16.8 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 739GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 72 73 73 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Read 343 Write 317 Mixed 289 SusWrite 71.9 57% 255 MB/s	4K Read 26.2 4K Write 49 4K Mixed 36.4 112% 37.2 MB/s	DQ Read 38 DQ Write 96.5 DQ Mixed 52.4 44% 62.3 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 133%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 5TB 1,926 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2TB free Firmware: 0342 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 57 56 54 55 61 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	8.28% Terrible	Read 72.1 Write 73.3 Mixed 63.2 SusWrite 56.2 15% 66.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 8.4 4K Mixed 0.7 6% 3.23 MB/s	DQ Read 1.1 DQ Write 7.1 DQ Mixed 1.9 2% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.28% Great: 18%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 92GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 73 73 73 74 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	49.8% Average	Read 100 Write 89.8 Mixed 61.1 SusWrite 72.6 60% 81 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 88%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 11,959 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 4.5TB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 31 31 31 30 31 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	46.7% Average	Read 129 Write 144 Mixed 81.8 SusWrite 32.2 72% 96.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.6 209% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 94%
WD My Book 1230 5TB 1,107 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 371GB free, PID 1230 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 54 53 54 53 53 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	36.3% Below average	Read 112 Write 104 Mixed 81 SusWrite 54 114% 87.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 126% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 63%
WD Elements 107C 4TB 3,603 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 589GB free, PID 107c Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 51 51 54 54 54 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	30.2% Below average	Read 84.3 Write 79.7 Mixed 66.2 SusWrite 53.2 94% 70.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 105% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 60%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB 55 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 79GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 17 17 17 17 18 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	24.2% Poor	Read 90.4 Write 87.2 Mixed 56.6 SusWrite 17.5 80% 62.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 59%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB 55 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 682GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 17 17 17 17 18 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	25.3% Poor	Read 98 Write 93.7 Mixed 66.1 SusWrite 17.4 87% 68.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1600 CL10 Series 4x8GB 823 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	MC Read 20.3 MC Write 20.4 MC Mixed 18.3 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 17.9 49% 17 GB/s	Latency 72.4 55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CM6870 Builds (Compare 645 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus CM6870

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	504x
Core i5-3450Intel $59Bench 66%, 34,199 samples	47x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	21x

GPU
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	58x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	37x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	34x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	19x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	17x

RAM
SLA302G08-GGNHC 4x4GBUnknownBench 56%, 881 samples	57x
EL64C1C1624Z1 4x4GBAdataBench 56%, 506 samples	47x
SLA302G08-GGNNG 4x4GBUnknownBench 56%, 364 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16