Asrock Z170 OC Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics43.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z170 OC Formula  (all builds)
Memory19.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180302
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 29 '19 at 12:43
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 92.4
1-Core 135
2-Core 267
92% 165 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 571
61% 486 Pts
64-Core 683
42% 683 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
Asus(1043 849E) 3GB
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.9% Average
Lighting 52.7
Reflection 65
Parallax 70.7
43% 62.8 fps
MRender 75.2
Gravity 49.6
Splatting 47.9
46% 57.6 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
345GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 19 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
142GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 251 251 250 250 249 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 466
Mixed 408
SusWrite 262
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 57.6
203% 72.6 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 227
207% 317 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 115%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 159 157 158 159 159 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 33.3
Write 79.3
Mixed 36
SusWrite 155
55% 76 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
36% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54%
Great: 90%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 123 126 125 125 124 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 59
Write 49.2
Mixed 71.2
SusWrite 124
56% 75.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 86%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
995GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 259 258 258 257 259 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
185% Outstanding
Read 385
Write 262
Mixed 128
SusWrite 258
188% 258 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 1.7
537% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 185%
Great: 213%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3466C16-4GVK 0420 F4-3200C16-8GVKB 0420 F4-3466C16-4GVK 0420 F4-3200C16-8GVKB 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.6% Good
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 18.9
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 19.9
56% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 OC Formula Builds (Compare 101 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock Z170 OC Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $740
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback