Asus G752VL

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	9.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus G752VL (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G752VL
Memory	19.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170629
Uptime	3.7 Days
Run Date	Nov 23 '19 at 20:11
Run Duration	225 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	Memory 71 1-Core 80.5 2-Core 144 58% 98.5 Pts	4-Core 224 8-Core 432 39% 328 Pts	64-Core 470 29% 470 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M 1,665 User benchmarks, average bench 24% Asus(1043 1CED) 2GB CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.20 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	9.55% Terrible	Lighting 13.1 Reflection 12 Parallax 9.97 11% 11.7 fps	MRender 2.95 Gravity 11.5 Splatting 11.2 7% 8.55 fps
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 9.55% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 108 111 110 108 108 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 1,963 Write 113 Mixed 190 SusWrite 110 126% 594 MB/s	4K Read 36.1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 3.2 60% 13.7 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 393%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB 13,039 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 22GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 260 274 287 287 283 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	62.6% Good	Read 358 Write 354 Mixed 336 SusWrite 274 74% 331 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 32.3 4K Mixed 24.4 81% 26 MB/s	DQ Read 126 DQ Write 162 DQ Mixed 157 115% 149 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 99%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49 47,332 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 142GB free Firmware: 0003SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 89 88 89 88 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	49.7% Average	Read 85.5 Write 75.7 Mixed 47.7 SusWrite 87.8 54% 74.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.8 131% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 58%
Samsung SSD 840 PRO Seri 128GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 120% 118GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 56 52 54 55 56 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 126 Write 122 Mixed 120 SusWrite 54.4 140% 106 MB/s	4K Read 13.3 4K Write 23.3 4K Mixed 18.6 1,474% 18.4 MB/s	DQ Read 19.8 DQ Write 37.5 DQ Mixed 19.9 2,026% 25.7 MB/s
Poor: 99% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 153%
WDC WD10 EACS-00ZJB0 1TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 324GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 0.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Read 43.8 Write 35.3 Mixed 32 SusWrite 0.2 34% 27.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 34%
Generic External 1TB 830 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 122GB free, PID 3920 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	19.1% Very poor	Read 35 Write 38 Mixed 33 SusWrite 38 50% 36 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 63%
HDS72505 0KLA360 500GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 84GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 1 0.7 0.3 0.2 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	11% Very poor	Read 37 Write 39.2 Mixed 26.5 SusWrite 0.9 33% 25.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 20%
HDS72505 0KLA360 500GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 345GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 56 51 54 55 56 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	27.4% Poor	Read 60.2 Write 57 Mixed 32 SusWrite 53.9 67% 50.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1G43DB0-CPB M471A1K43CB1-CRC M471A1G43DB0-CPB M471A1K43CB1-CRC 32GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	65.4% Good	MC Read 22.5 MC Write 27 MC Mixed 22.3 68% 23.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 23.6 SC Mixed 17.5 51% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 99.1 40% 99.1 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G752VL Builds (Compare 239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

System: Asus G752VL

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	239x

GPU
GeForce GTX 965MNvidiaBench 24%, 1,665 samples	238x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1x

SSD
SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsung $31Bench 183%, 9,202 samples	21x
SAMSUNG MZVLV128 128GBNvmeBench 104%, 3,203 samples	13x
Raid 0 Volume 2TBIntelBench 307%, 9,880 samples	7x

RAM
M471A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 20,956 samples	54x
M471A1G43DB0-CPB Hynix HMA451S6AFR8N-TF 12GBSamsungBench 53%, 1,205 samples	38x
M471A1G43DB0-CPB 3x8GBSamsungBench 60%, 485 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $31

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16