Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 172%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 156%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics164% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive278% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 17 '22 at 02:26
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$167
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 92.9
1-Core 168
2-Core 296
103% 186 Pts
4-Core 638
8-Core 984
100% 811 Pts
64-Core 1,126
70% 1,126 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 106%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$582
Nvidia(10DE 14B2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
164% Outstanding
Lighting 244
Reflection 219
Parallax 214
199% 226 fps
MRender 256
Gravity 160
Splatting 130
143% 182 fps
Poor: 132%
This bench: 164%
Great: 169%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$50
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 921 779 762 755 738 722 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
278% Outstanding
Read 2,554
Write 1,802
Mixed 1,641
SusWrite 780
377% 1,694 MB/s
4K Read 67.8
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 91.6
303% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,363
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 94.8
240% 542 MB/s
Poor: 202%
This bench: 278%
Great: 345%
Adata SU630 480GB
141GB free
Firmware: S0827A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 377 242 18 89 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 497
Write 391
Mixed 386
SusWrite 127
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 88.3
4K Mixed 0.4
92% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 16.9
DQ Mixed 0.4
16% 40.4 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$68
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 160 174 176 174 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 109
Write 143
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 168
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
101% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 90%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$53
451GB free
Firmware: 0002SDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 101 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 100
Write 85.8
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 101
61% 83.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 58%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB
3.5TB free, PID d011
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 181 177 186 175 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 161
Write 152
Mixed 80.4
SusWrite 181
192% 143 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
175% 6.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$250
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
MC Read 39.3
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 34.1
92% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 31.1
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 36.2
87% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 8 144 27" 1280 720 GSM5B7F LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 19,918 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 129%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,125
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $320Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $410Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i3-12100F $98Nvidia RTX 3070 $568Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12400F $164Nvidia RTX 3050 $298Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $50SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $49SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $417SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback