Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 216% UFO	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 203% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	238% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	91.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	52.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210616
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 08 '22 at 13:10
Run Duration	262 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260 60,132 User benchmarks, average bench 99% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	93.9% Outstanding	Memory 77 1-Core 160 2-Core 338 100% 192 Pts	4-Core 594 8-Core 952 95% 773 Pts	64-Core 1125 70% 1125 Pts
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 93.9% Great: 108%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-Ti 16,406 User benchmarks, average bench 232% MSI(1462 5090) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 526.47 Performing below potential (67^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	238% Outstanding	Lighting 356 Reflection 310 Parallax 384 290% 350 fps	MRender 390 Gravity 310 Splatting 205 236% 302 fps
Poor: 205% ↑ This bench: 238% Great: 247%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB 97,462 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 124GB free (System drive) Firmware: 401000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 233 206 202 169 130 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	91.4% Outstanding	Read 291 Write 328 Mixed 133 SusWrite 202 54% 238 MB/s	4K Read 34.5 4K Write 100 4K Mixed 47.8 167% 60.9 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 159 172% 289 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 111%
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TB 21,743 User benchmarks, average bench 345% 747GB free Firmware: GXA7601Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 3043 2948 3042 2678 1544 1540 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	400% Outstanding	Read 2,758 Write 3,061 Mixed 2,865 SusWrite 2466 630% 2,787 MB/s	4K Read 74.7 4K Write 146 4K Mixed 95.9 314% 106 MB/s	DQ Read 1,205 DQ Write 668 DQ Mixed 916 687% 930 MB/s
Poor: 192% ↑ This bench: 400% Great: 444%
Seagate ST4000LM024-2AN17V 4TB 7,786 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 3TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 133 128 127 127 120 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	51.6% Above average	Read 60.3 Write 123 Mixed 65.6 SusWrite 119 68% 91.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 0.6 161% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 63%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB 210 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 726GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	27.8% Poor	Read 82.9 Write 99.7 Mixed 63.5 SusWrite 0.5 80% 61.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.4 188% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 74%
TOSHIBA MQ03ABB300 3TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 81 81 81 81 81 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40.2% Average	Read 113 Write 122 Mixed 46.6 SusWrite 80.2 119% 90.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 40%
Samsung SSD 840 PRO Seri 128GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 120% 65GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 81 81 81 81 81 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	98.9% Outstanding	Read 123 Write 125 Mixed 114 SusWrite 80.3 149% 111 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 19.5 4K Mixed 18 1,332% 17.6 MB/s	DQ Read 16.3 DQ Write 28.4 DQ Mixed 19.4 1,686% 21.4 MB/s
Poor: 99% ↑ This bench: 98.9% Great: 153%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB 210 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 3.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 106 Write 138 Mixed 68 134% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.9 207% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x31.5GB 321 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	73.2% Very good	MC Read 30.9 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 28.9 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 24.7 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 28.7 68% 23.8 GB/s	Latency 86.3 46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 133%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,946 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 142%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $110Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	2,634x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $158Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,232x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $88Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	859x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	826x
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	705x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	625x

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	311x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	306x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	276x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	376x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	223x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	205x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $740

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16