| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 46.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 72.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130806 |
| Uptime | 33.7 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 15 '19 at 08:15 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 44% |
PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
46.3%
Average
|
44% 68.3 Pts
|
19% 146 Pts
|
11% 183 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 440.97
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
46.2%
Average
|
46% 57.9 fps
|
46% 57.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 251 266 267 272 271 MB/s
|
72.8%
Very good
|
75% 334 MB/s
|
102% 34.1 MB/s
|
139% 193 MB/s
|
|
SAMSUNG HN-M101MBB 1TB
605GB free, PID fc74
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 97 97 96 97 97 MB/s
|
40.3%
Average
|
100% 75.8 MB/s
|
97% 1.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
|
21.8%
Poor
|
21% 7.33 GB/s
|
14% 5.03 GB/s
|
39% 103 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-970A-UD3P Builds (Compare 825 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P - $300
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 230x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 227x |
| FX-8320AMD $125Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 148x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 50x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 47x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 39x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $549 |