Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	3.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	29.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191018
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 07 '19 at 14:37
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	86.8% Excellent	Memory 85.8 1-Core 117 2-Core 230 81% 144 Pts	4-Core 470 8-Core 934 83% 702 Pts	64-Core 1,295 80% 1,295 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Gigabyte(1458 3544) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	3.44% Terrible	Lighting 4.23 Reflection 5.19 Parallax 1.19 4% 3.54 fps	MRender 5.67 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 3.09 3% 4.35 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.44% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 297 296 296 296 297 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 499 Write 482 Mixed 396 SusWrite 314 95% 423 MB/s	4K Read 45.2 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 60.2 202% 70.8 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 360 271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 124%
Seagate ST500DM005 HD502HJ 500GB 10,272 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 221GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 89 91 91 93 91 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Read 134 Write 90.7 Mixed 66.4 SusWrite 91 70% 95.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 77%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 211GB free Firmware: CR100-11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 73 74 73 74 72 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	42.1% Average	Read 75.3 Write 80 Mixed 48.1 SusWrite 71 50% 68.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 44%
Toshiba HDWQ140 4TB 4,700 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2.5TB free Firmware: FJ1M SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 182 190 185 190 188 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 196 Write 195 Mixed 98.1 SusWrite 188 124% 169 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1.1 277% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 112%
Innostor Innostor 16GB 2,388 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 14GB free, PID 0917 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 22 23 23 23 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	21.1% Poor	Read 108 Write 23.2 Mixed 19.6 SusWrite 22.6 44% 43.3 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 13% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 25%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12 26,708 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 54GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 22 19 20 21 19 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	21.6% Poor	Read 98.5 Write 52 Mixed 22.2 SusWrite 21 54% 48.4 MB/s	4K Read 10.3 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.2 48% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 30%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB 589 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 7788 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.8 4.7 4.4 4.7 4.5 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	4.01% Terrible	Read 10.8 Write 3 Mixed 2 SusWrite 4.6 6% 5.1 MB/s	4K Read 6.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 23% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.01% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C14 2x16GB 2,984 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	MC Read 44.9 MC Write 40.4 MC Mixed 39.2 119% 41.5 GB/s	SC Read 27.6 SC Write 43.6 SC Mixed 35.3 102% 35.5 GB/s	Latency 71.4 56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 144%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	21x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $651

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)