HP Pavilion Power Desktop 580-0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion Power Desktop 580-0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F1
Memory4.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180306
Uptime8.7 Days
Run DateNov 01 '19 at 10:35
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 86.3
1-Core 101
2-Core 192
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 384
53% 393 Pts
64-Core 378
23% 378 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
HP(103C 8338) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.7
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Lighting 33.3
Reflection 24.6
Parallax 30.2
27% 29.3 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 32
Splatting 31.1
27% 33.5 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HAHQ-000H1 128GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 133 126 119 111 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 375
Write 376
Mixed 357
SusWrite 134
70% 310 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 89.5
4K Mixed 52.2
169% 59.3 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 348
264% 355 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
212GB free
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 140 137 141 141 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 125
Write 131
Mixed 72
SusWrite 140
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 112%
Seagate FreeAgentDesktop 500GB
89GB free, PID 3000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 32 31 33 33 32 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 32.3
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 31.9
42% 30.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 17%
USB-HS WDC WD2500BB-00G 250GB
25GB free, PID 002a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 23 23 22 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14% Very poor
Read 26.5
Write 23.3
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 22.2
30% 22.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CTD Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 12GB
2666, 2666 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
56.6% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 16.8
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Power Desktop 580-0xx Builds (Compare 460 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: HP Pavilion Power Desktop 580-0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $189
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback