MSI Z370 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7B46)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B46
MotherboardMSI Z370 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7B46)  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180308
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateOct 26 '19 at 14:27
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Memory 97.1
1-Core 136
2-Core 202
86% 145 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 840
83% 680 Pts
64-Core 1,005
62% 1,005 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
MSI(1462 360C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Lighting 180
Reflection 193
Parallax 196
146% 190 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 180
Splatting 122
115% 142 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 129%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB-$60
399GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 545 543 541 536 527 547 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 2,470
Write 535
Mixed 662
SusWrite 540
229% 1,052 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 55.9
208% 83 MB/s
DQ Read 602
DQ Write 548
DQ Mixed 504
398% 552 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 221%
Great: 333%
Intel 545s Series 256GB-$79
229GB free
Firmware: LHF002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 270 272 271 266 268 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 461
Mixed 454
SusWrite 282
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 67.5
222% 76.7 MB/s
DQ Read 301
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 249
207% 297 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 122%
Great: 117%
XPG SX950U 960GB
893GB free
Firmware: Q0922FS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 416 421 424 422 422 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 457
Mixed 406
SusWrite 420
101% 450 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 34.7
146% 57 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 260
195% 256 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 102%
Great: 113%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
791GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 187 159 173 182 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 178
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 174
102% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 101%
Great: 107%
Seagate ST2000NE0025-2FL101 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: EN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 182 179 180 182 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 176
Mixed 86.3
SusWrite 180
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
249% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 104%
Great: 109%
ADATA SP 900 128GB
119GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 105 106 106 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 228
Write 162
Mixed 180
SusWrite 105
217% 169 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 26
4K Mixed 19.1
1,598% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 18.7
DQ Write 29
DQ Mixed 20.6
1,756% 22.8 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 140%
Great: 164%
Innostor Ext. HDD 500GB
220GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 114 113 113 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 112
Write 118
Mixed 59
SusWrite 113
135% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 69%
HGST HTS 545050A7E380 500GB
466GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 105 106 106 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
43% Average
Read 104
Write 98.7
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 105
115% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 43%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C19 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 39.6
MC Mixed 28.1
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 37.7
SC Mixed 30.2
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 49.8
80% 49.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7B46) Builds (Compare 1,061 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI Z370 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7B46) - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $701
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback