MSI Z370 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7B46)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive219% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B46
MotherboardMSI Z370 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7B46)  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180308
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 05 '19 at 23:45
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Memory 97.3
1-Core 138
2-Core 274
95% 170 Pts
4-Core 549
8-Core 830
86% 690 Pts
64-Core 1,082
67% 1,082 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
MSI(1462 360C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Lighting 179
Reflection 196
Parallax 179
146% 185 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 180
Splatting 127
117% 144 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 129%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB-$60
404GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 537 532 536 545 551 554 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
219% Outstanding
Read 2,462
Write 532
Mixed 605
SusWrite 542
225% 1,035 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 55.1
202% 80.8 MB/s
DQ Read 589
DQ Write 520
DQ Mixed 449
366% 520 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 219%
Great: 333%
Intel 545s Series 256GB-$79
229GB free
Firmware: LHF002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 273 272 273 272 272 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 433
Mixed 453
SusWrite 285
94% 421 MB/s
4K Read 50.6
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 68.4
224% 77.1 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 249
208% 299 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 122%
Great: 117%
XPG SX950U 960GB
893GB free
Firmware: Q0922FS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 175 147 434 433 432 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 447
Mixed 393
SusWrite 341
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 48.1
171% 65 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 261
199% 266 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 106%
Great: 113%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
794GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 178 189 189 188 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 174
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 182
103% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
120% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 104%
Great: 107%
Seagate ST2000NE0025-2FL101 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: EN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 96 96 96 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 180
Write 180
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 95.6
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
257% 2 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 109%
ADATA SP 900 128GB
119GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 98 93 94 93 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 205
Write 132
Mixed 168
SusWrite 93.6
192% 150 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 26
4K Mixed 18.7
1,586% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 18.8
DQ Write 26.7
DQ Mixed 19.8
1,651% 21.8 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 134%
Great: 164%
Innostor Ext. HDD 500GB
466GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 128 129 131 129 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 130
Write 118
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 129
147% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 69%
HGST HTS 545050A7E380 500GB
466GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 97 94 95 93 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 103
Write 83.3
Mixed 38
SusWrite 94.1
104% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C19 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 39.9
MC Write 43.6
MC Mixed 29.2
107% 37.6 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 46
SC Mixed 33.1
97% 34.1 GB/s
Latency 49
82% 49 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 107%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7B46) Builds (Compare 1,061 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI Z370 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7B46) - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $701
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback