MSI Z370 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7B46)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive220% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B46
MotherboardMSI Z370 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7B46)  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180308
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateOct 18 '19 at 11:46
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Memory 97.5
1-Core 139
2-Core 274
95% 170 Pts
4-Core 548
8-Core 899
88% 724 Pts
64-Core 1,139
70% 1,139 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
MSI(1462 360C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Lighting 181
Reflection 194
Parallax 179
147% 185 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 180
Splatting 126
116% 144 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 130%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB-$60
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 537 534 540 508 535 536 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 2,366
Write 546
Mixed 490
SusWrite 532
213% 983 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 61.3
214% 83.8 MB/s
DQ Read 634
DQ Write 549
DQ Mixed 506
403% 563 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 220%
Great: 333%
Intel 545s Series 256GB-$79
229GB free
Firmware: LHF002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 298 271 268 271 270 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 468
Mixed 447
SusWrite 282
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 50.7
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 66.6
219% 75 MB/s
DQ Read 307
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 252
209% 299 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 121%
Great: 117%
XPG SX950U 960GB
893GB free
Firmware: Q0922FS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 416 419 425 423 424 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 519
Write 451
Mixed 401
SusWrite 421
101% 448 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 48.6
170% 64.4 MB/s
DQ Read 265
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 205
177% 259 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 112%
Great: 113%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
791GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 170 158 173 174 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 150
Write 172
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 168
95% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
128% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 107%
Seagate ST2000NE0025-2FL101 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: EN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 180 183 183 183 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 173
Mixed 84.5
SusWrite 182
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
259% 2 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 102%
Great: 109%
ADATA SP 900 128GB
119GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 106 106 106 106 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 227
Write 153
Mixed 177
SusWrite 105
212% 165 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 25.6
4K Mixed 19.8
1,611% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 18.7
DQ Write 27.3
DQ Mixed 19.9
1,675% 22 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 139%
Great: 164%
Innostor Ext. HDD 500GB
351GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 120 122 122 122 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 126
Write 123
Mixed 64.8
SusWrite 122
145% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 69%
HGST HTS 545050A7E380 500GB
466GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 105 106 106 106 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 104
Write 81.5
Mixed 39
SusWrite 105
108% 82.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C19 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 39.4
MC Write 40.7
MC Mixed 28.5
103% 36.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 42.6
SC Mixed 33.5
94% 33.1 GB/s
Latency 48.1
83% 48.1 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 104%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7B46) Builds (Compare 1,061 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI Z370 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7B46) - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $701
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback