MSI Z370 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7B46)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B46
MotherboardMSI Z370 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7B46)  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180308
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 09 '19 at 19:32
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Memory 97.2
1-Core 135
2-Core 275
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 543
8-Core 900
88% 722 Pts
64-Core 1,137
70% 1,137 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
MSI(1462 360C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Lighting 181
Reflection 196
Parallax 179
148% 185 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 177
Splatting 122
114% 141 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 129%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB-$60
400GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 503 526 524 514 531 525 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 2,403
Write 524
Mixed 562
SusWrite 521
218% 1,003 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 53.1
224% 87.3 MB/s
DQ Read 610
DQ Write 542
DQ Mixed 460
377% 537 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 221%
Great: 333%
Intel 545s Series 256GB-$79
229GB free
Firmware: LHF002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 269 271 272 272 271 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 519
Write 462
Mixed 457
SusWrite 279
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 50.9
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 67.7
223% 76.9 MB/s
DQ Read 307
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 250
209% 299 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 122%
Great: 117%
XPG SX950U 960GB
893GB free
Firmware: Q0922FS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 430 432 435 435 434 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 454
Mixed 394
SusWrite 432
101% 449 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 48.7
168% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 260
196% 258 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 111%
Great: 113%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
794GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 166 160 188 188 188 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 145
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 176
96% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
124% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 101%
Great: 107%
Seagate ST2000NE0025-2FL101 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: EN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 94 95 95 95 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 179
Write 179
Mixed 85
SusWrite 93.9
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
255% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 109%
ADATA SP 900 128GB
119GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 106 107 106 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 220
Write 160
Mixed 176
SusWrite 106
214% 166 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 25.5
4K Mixed 19.1
1,584% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 18.4
DQ Write 26.7
DQ Mixed 19.9
1,653% 21.7 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 138%
Great: 164%
Innostor Ext. HDD 500GB
466GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 130 130 131 131 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 124
Write 126
Mixed 64
SusWrite 130
150% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 69%
HGST HTS 545050A7E380 500GB
466GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 106 107 106 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 101
Write 99.5
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 106
115% 86.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C19 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 39.9
MC Write 43.2
MC Mixed 29.3
107% 37.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 46.4
SC Mixed 33.2
96% 33.4 GB/s
Latency 49.7
81% 49.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 106%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7B46) Builds (Compare 1,061 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI Z370 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7B46) - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $701
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback