HP ProDesk 600 G5 Desktop Mini

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.87% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive259% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G5 Desktop Mini  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8598
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190726
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 16 '19 at 18:39
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9500T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 92.7
1-Core 117
2-Core 232
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 658
68% 546 Pts
64-Core 656
41% 656 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
HP(103C 8598) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
6.87% Terrible
Lighting 6.77
Reflection 10.9
Parallax 7.56
6% 8.4 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 6.77
Splatting 14.9
10% 11.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.87%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2020 557 563 556 556 555 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
259% Outstanding
Read 1,910
Write 2,193
Mixed 1,058
SusWrite 801
334% 1,491 MB/s
4K Read 58.9
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 77.8
253% 85.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,371
DQ Write 1079
DQ Mixed 1,111
862% 1,187 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 259%
Great: 340%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD - [0xF785] J641GU42J9266ND 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84.7% Excellent
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 24.4
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 32.2
SC Mixed 26.8
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G5 Desktop Mini Builds (Compare 188 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G5 Desktop Mini

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback