| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
| Graphics | 114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20170322 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 09 '19 at 01:48 |
| Run Duration | 257 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 15% |
PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
90.4%
Outstanding
|
90% 159 Pts
|
77% 631 Pts
|
50% 800 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2902 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.48
|
114%
Outstanding
|
126% 149 fps
|
100% 124 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
385GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
|
2,037% 9,045 MB/s
|
1,758% 524 MB/s
|
1,944% 2,588 MB/s
| |
|
|
2,051% 9,108 MB/s
|
1,859% 561 MB/s
|
2,068% 2,774 MB/s
| |
|
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$100
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 176 175 175 175 176 MB/s
|
||||
|
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 184 183 184 184 181 MB/s
|
||||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Avexir DDR4-2666 CL17 4GB 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
82%
Excellent
|
83% 29 GB/s
|
72% 25.2 GB/s
|
63% 63.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical MAXIMUS IX FORMULA Builds (Compare 1,547 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA - $412
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-7700KIntel $249Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 1,174x |
| Core i7-6700KIntel $170Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 180x |
| Core i7-7700k VHIntelBench 84%, 9,708 samples | 79x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 343x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 237x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 96x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 65% - Good | Total price: $1,231 |