Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190731
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 05 '19 at 16:08
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Memory 80.2
1-Core 151
2-Core 299
95% 177 Pts
4-Core 543
8-Core 1,004
92% 774 Pts
64-Core 1,414
88% 1,414 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 126
Parallax 149
110% 137 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 130
Splatting 105
112% 142 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid PCIe SSD 256GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FM Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 607 585 651 399 88 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 593
Write 662
Mixed 604
SusWrite 406
128% 566 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 97.2
4K Mixed 32.1
128% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 686
DQ Mixed 264
252% 377 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
151GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1351 299 300 299 299 299 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
281% Outstanding
Read 2525
Write 1,472
Mixed 1,063
SusWrite 475
305% 1,384 MB/s
4K Read 65
4K Write 203
4K Mixed 90.3
322% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 969
DQ Write 1,360
DQ Mixed 997
800% 1,108 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 281%
Great: 280%
PNY CS1311 120GB-$63
54GB free
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 91 92 91 77 91 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 509
Write 449
Mixed 360
SusWrite 105
79% 355 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 91.8
4K Mixed 40.2
148% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 321
DQ Write 374
DQ Mixed 184
184% 293 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 91%
Adata SU800NS38 128GB
30GB free
Firmware: Q0125D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 32 16 30 17 15 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 508
Write 424
Mixed 396
SusWrite 41.1
76% 342 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 53.7
4K Mixed 33
116% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 54.9
DQ Mixed 82.5
62% 85.1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 102%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
1TB free
Firmware: MK7OA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 135 134 136 137 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 135
Write 131
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 136
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FD BLS16G4D26BFST.16FD BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FD 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.3% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 19.1
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 22.4
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,662 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $661
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback