Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 29 '19 at 11:54
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Memory 79.8
1-Core 150
2-Core 299
95% 176 Pts
4-Core 583
8-Core 1,010
96% 796 Pts
64-Core 1,412
87% 1,412 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 126
Parallax 149
111% 137 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 131
Splatting 107
112% 142 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid PCIe SSD 256GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FM Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 604 593 176 84 98 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 601
Write 659
Mixed 600
SusWrite 277
120% 534 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 97.6
4K Mixed 32.1
128% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 687
DQ Mixed 260
250% 376 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 108%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
110GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1349 289 290 290 298 299 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 2,522
Write 1,469
Mixed 1,066
SusWrite 469
305% 1,382 MB/s
4K Read 63.8
4K Write 203
4K Mixed 89.8
319% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 968
DQ Write 1,380
DQ Mixed 995
802% 1114 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 280%
Great: 280%
PNY CS1311 120GB-$63
55GB free
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 77 50 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 512
Write 126
Mixed 362
SusWrite 81.6
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 94.3
4K Mixed 39.6
148% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 375
DQ Mixed 184
185% 294 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 91%
Adata SU800NS38 128GB
30GB free
Firmware: Q0125D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 370 59 53 52 53 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 510
Write 417
Mixed 393
SusWrite 170
83% 373 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 98.9
4K Mixed 42.5
151% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 151
141% 210 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 102%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
1TB free
Firmware: MK7OA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 148 149 148 147 149 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 141
Write 138
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 148
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 83%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FD BLS16G4D26BFST.16FD BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FD 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.7% Good
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 19.6
60% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 23
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,662 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $661
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback