Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190731
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 02 '19 at 01:24
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Memory 79.8
1-Core 150
2-Core 299
95% 176 Pts
4-Core 566
8-Core 954
92% 760 Pts
64-Core 1,390
86% 1,390 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
107% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 124
Parallax 146
108% 134 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 127
Splatting 103
110% 139 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 107%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid PCIe SSD 256GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FM Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 586 650 653 491 225 207 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 523
Write 540
Mixed 527
SusWrite 469
116% 515 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 92.4
4K Mixed 32
117% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 580
DQ Mixed 204
207% 322 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 102%
Great: 108%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
151GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1344 300 299 299 299 299 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
279% Outstanding
Read 2,514
Write 1,470
Mixed 1,083
SusWrite 473
306% 1,385 MB/s
4K Read 64.5
4K Write 199
4K Mixed 89.9
318% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 970
DQ Write 1,356
DQ Mixed 997
800% 1,108 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 279%
Great: 280%
PNY CS1311 120GB-$63
55GB free
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 510
Write 121
Mixed 366
SusWrite 71.9
59% 267 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 91.2
4K Mixed 39.8
148% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 323
DQ Write 369
DQ Mixed 179
181% 291 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 91%
Adata SU800NS38 128GB
30GB free
Firmware: Q0125D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 234 87 49 52 52 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 510
Write 436
Mixed 398
SusWrite 153
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 97.9
4K Mixed 42.8
151% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 152
142% 211 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 102%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
1TB free
Firmware: MK7OA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 138 141 138 139 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 117
Write 124
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 138
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FD BLS16G4D26BFST.16FD BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FD 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.7% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 21.6
65% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 24.3
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,662 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $661
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback