Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 01 '19 at 23:18
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Memory 83.1
1-Core 151
2-Core 299
96% 178 Pts
4-Core 586
8-Core 1,037
98% 811 Pts
64-Core 1,417
88% 1,417 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 127
Parallax 136
111% 133 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 130
Splatting 106
112% 142 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid PCIe SSD 256GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FM Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 588 644 573 54 43 48 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 608
Write 663
Mixed 615
SusWrite 325
124% 553 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 97.7
4K Mixed 32.2
129% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 686
DQ Mixed 261
251% 376 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
151GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1345 299 300 298 299 299 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
283% Outstanding
Read 2,530
Write 1,471
Mixed 1,070
SusWrite 473
306% 1,386 MB/s
4K Read 65.3
4K Write 204
4K Mixed 91.9
325% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 967
DQ Write 1,378
DQ Mixed 996
802% 1,114 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 283%
Great: 280%
PNY CS1311 120GB-$63
55GB free
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 89 90 90 90 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 510
Write 120
Mixed 380
SusWrite 115
62% 281 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 91.4
4K Mixed 39.6
147% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 181
180% 287 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 91%
Adata SU800NS38 128GB
30GB free
Firmware: Q0125D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 399 40 53 52 52 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 506
Write 411
Mixed 393
SusWrite 172
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 96.2
4K Mixed 42.4
150% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 150
139% 207 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 102%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
1TB free
Firmware: MK7OA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 137 138 136 138 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 126
Write 122
Mixed 77.3
SusWrite 137
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FD BLS16G4D26BFST.16FD BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FD 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.9% Good
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 20.1
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 22.9
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,662 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $661
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback