Asus Z77-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics31.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z77-A  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130128
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateSep 29 '19 at 19:32
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 93%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
50.9% Above average
Memory 50.6
1-Core 61.8
2-Core 120
44% 77.4 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 486
46% 380 Pts
64-Core 489
30% 489 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Device(7377 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Lighting 39.5
Reflection 29.1
Parallax 39.2
32% 35.9 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 38.3
Splatting 32.5
29% 36 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac 240GB 240GB
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 143 8.3 113 15 13 MB/s
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44% Average
Read 236
Write 217
Mixed 220
SusWrite 83.7
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 15.6
78% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 96.3
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 22.6
52% 104 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44%
Great: 93%
SSD 240GB
152GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 85 71 77 94 44 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54% Above average
Read 232
Write 206
Mixed 200
SusWrite 97.6
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 50.4
4K Mixed 26.3
98% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 158
129% 182 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 54%
Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
776GB free
Firmware: HP35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 97 100 99 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 108
Write 94.5
Mixed 60
SusWrite 98.6
66% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 68%
WD WD3009FYPX-09AAMB0 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01D01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 91 92 91 91 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 79.5
Write 72.7
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 90.8
56% 76.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 029E CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
49.7% Average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 18.7
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6
17% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 159
25% 159 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77-A Builds (Compare 496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus Z77-A - $144

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $580
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback