Asus F2A85-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus F2A85-M LE  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121022
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateSep 27 '19 at 21:03
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Memory 80.6
1-Core 65
2-Core 117
55% 87.6 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 196
26% 193 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Asus(1043 83F3) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
7.3% Terrible
Lighting 8.37
Reflection 7.73
Parallax 8.97
7% 8.36 fps
MRender 8.76
Gravity 10.3
Splatting 10.7
8% 9.92 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.3%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
446GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 389 394 398 398 395 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 453
Write 365
Mixed 355
SusWrite 388
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 77.4
4K Mixed 47.3
153% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 255
191% 255 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 101%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
546GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 69 71 86 92 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 98.7
Write 107
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 80.3
64% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 68%
TDK 16GB
15GB free, PID 0a03
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 4.3 4.2 4.3 4.2 4.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 19.3
Write 13.2
Mixed 14
SusWrite 4.2
16% 12.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.3
157% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.9% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 6.9
20% 7.07 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 7.5
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F2A85-M LE Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A85-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $147
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback