Asus F2A85-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus F2A85-M LE  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121022
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateSep 24 '19 at 21:56
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Memory 75.5
1-Core 40.2
2-Core 112
47% 76 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 183
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Asus(1043 83F3) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
7.05% Terrible
Lighting 8
Reflection 7.65
Parallax 8.88
6% 8.18 fps
MRender 8.62
Gravity 10.1
Splatting 10.5
8% 9.76 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.05%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
446GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 381 389 390 389 395 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 436
Write 399
Mixed 369
SusWrite 385
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 79.6
4K Mixed 50.4
162% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 255
192% 256 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 103%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
542GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 78 92 90 86 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 101
Write 92.3
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 84.1
62% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
149% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 68%
TDK 16GB
15GB free, PID 0a03
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.2 4.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
9.9% Terrible
Read 18.3
Write 12.7
Mixed 13
SusWrite 4.4
15% 12.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 2.3
151% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.9%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.4% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 6.8
20% 6.97 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 8.2
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F2A85-M LE Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A85-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $147
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback