bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DP55KG
Memory8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110630
Uptime6 Days
Run DateSep 09 '19 at 06:40
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
LGA 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 93.3
1-Core 84.5
2-Core 161
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 322
39% 299 Pts
64-Core 315
20% 315 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Zotac(19DA 1368) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
52.9% Above average
Lighting 65.6
Reflection 69.5
Parallax 67.4
54% 67.5 fps
MRender 73.6
Gravity 63.6
Splatting 56.2
52% 64.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 70 19 22 34 79 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.6% Poor
Read 207
Write 162
Mixed 140
SusWrite 59.2
32% 142 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 13.8
4K Mixed 14.6
47% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 16.4
DQ Write 22.2
DQ Mixed 17
14% 18.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 55%
Seagate ST3500410AS 500GB
43GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 83 86 82 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 65
Write 60.3
Mixed 39
SusWrite 82.8
45% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
147% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 72%
Seagate Desktop 500GB
73GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 28.2
Write 19.8
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 18.2
28% 21.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 21%
ST932032 5AS 320GB
35GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 29.7
Write 20.5
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 18.2
28% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
49% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 18%
WD Elements 2TB
229GB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 20.3
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 25.6
32% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
51% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x393930353430332D3038332E4130304C4620 0x0198 0x393930353430332D3038332E4130304C4620 0x0198 0x4B48583136303043313044332F3847202020 12GB
1333, 1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.7% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 7.3
24% 8.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 10.1
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,495 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback