bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DP55KG
Memory9.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110630
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 29 '19 at 09:33
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
LGA 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 74.1
2-Core 138
62% 100 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 318
36% 281 Pts
64-Core 326
20% 326 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Zotac(19DA 1368) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
53.2% Above average
Lighting 66.1
Reflection 69.7
Parallax 67.5
54% 67.8 fps
MRender 74.2
Gravity 64.1
Splatting 55.1
52% 64.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 23 48 42 28 64 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.6% Poor
Read 205
Write 167
Mixed 160
SusWrite 61.6
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 17.1
4K Mixed 5.8
37% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 18
DQ Write 21.8
DQ Mixed 16.1
13% 18.6 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
244GB free
Firmware: CC4H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 155 134 148 145 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 142
Write 163
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 142
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 114%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
58GB free
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 49 48 50 49 50 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 57.2
Write 55.9
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 49.2
37% 49.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 42%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
247GB free
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 53 52 52 52 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Read 44.8
Write 58.6
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 53
34% 46.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 54%
WD Elements 107C 500GB
40GB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 15 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 24.9
Write 20.2
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 15.6
26% 20 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 50%
ST932032 5AS 320GB
35GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 15 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
9.77% Terrible
Read 26.3
Write 20.4
Mixed 17.9
SusWrite 15.6
26% 20 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
49% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.77%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x393930353430332D3038332E4130304C4620 0x0198 0x393930353430332D3038332E4130304C4620 0x0198 0x4B48583136303043313044332F3847202020 12GB
1333, 1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 6.2
21% 7.3 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 7.6
25% 8.7 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,362 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback