Asrock H77 Pro4-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asrock H77 Pro4-M (all builds)
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130806
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 08 '19 at 05:56
Run Duration	389 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	79.5% Very good	Memory 93.7 1-Core 106 2-Core 209 79% 136 Pts	4-Core 354 8-Core 528 55% 441 Pts	64-Core 515 32% 515 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 3721) CLim: 2164 MHz, MLim: 2333 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 436.15 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 48% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 428GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 441 442 442 389 353 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 495 Write 464 Mixed 424 SusWrite 418 101% 450 MB/s	4K Read 36.6 4K Write 87.1 4K Mixed 43.8 158% 55.8 MB/s	DQ Read 304 DQ Write 277 DQ Mixed 290 218% 290 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 129%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 181GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 240 240 240 240 240 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	75.1% Very good	Read 258 Write 244 Mixed 233 SusWrite 240 55% 244 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 70.5 4K Mixed 37.3 134% 46.6 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 197 148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 124%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 127GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 126 126 126 129 128 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	75% Very good	Read 134 Write 134 Mixed 30.1 SusWrite 127 77% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 103%
WD Elements 25A1 2TB 7,574 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1TB free, PID 25a1 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 13 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	13% Very poor	Read 32.6 Write 27.7 Mixed 25.1 SusWrite 12.1 32% 24.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 58%
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB 8,748 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 9GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 8.8 4.6 4.2 9.8 9.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	10.5% Very poor	Read 32.6 Write 18.8 Mixed 14.8 SusWrite 7.4 22% 18.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 1.7 108% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 111%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB 7,719 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 4GB free, PID a81d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 6.3 7 6.6 6 6.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	5.91% Terrible	Read 23.8 Write 5 Mixed 8.5 SusWrite 6.3 12% 10.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 17% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.91% Great: 9%
TOSHIBA USB DRV 32GB 1,074 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 17GB free, PID 1400 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 6.8 7.8 7.8 7.6 7.4 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	6.98% Terrible	Read 31.3 Write 12.3 Mixed 18 SusWrite 7.5 20% 17.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.98% Great: 23%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23 12,481 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 41GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Read 32.4 Write 22.1 Mixed 25.3 SusWrite 17.2 31% 24.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 3.1 208% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 39%
TOSHIBA USB DRV 16GB 1,979 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 2GB free, PID 1400 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 20 19 19 21 20 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	9.52% Terrible	Read 24.8 Write 18.3 Mixed 2.8 SusWrite 18.5 20% 16.1 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0 28% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 9.52% Great: 23%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 5GB free, PID 1221 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 1 0 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	3.92% Terrible	Read 18.3 Write 7.3 Mixed 17 SusWrite 1.6 13% 11 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.92% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.C8 017A 78.B1GE3.4010C 859B CT51264BA160BJ.C8 017A 78.B1GE3.4010C 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	62.3% Good	MC Read 22.8 MC Write 21.7 MC Mixed 19.7 61% 21.4 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 20.3 55% 19.1 GB/s	Latency 60.5 66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H77 Pro4-M Builds (Compare 186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H77 Pro4-M

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	36x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	28x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	25x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	16x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	11x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $74Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	7x
X3 240GBTcsunbowBench 78%, 3,491 samples	7x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	6x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	6x
PSD38G13332 1x8GBPatriotBench 26%, 879 samples	4x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $571

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16