Asrock H77 Pro4-M

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	21.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asrock H77 Pro4-M (all builds)
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130806
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 20 '19 at 08:05
Run Duration	308 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	78.1% Very good	Memory 93 1-Core 104 2-Core 206 78% 134 Pts	4-Core 342 8-Core 513 53% 427 Pts	64-Core 511 32% 511 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 3721) CLim: 2176 MHz, MLim: 2257 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 425.31 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	21.5% Poor	Lighting 2.37 Reflection 63.6 Parallax 50.3 2% 38.8 fps	MRender 73 Gravity 70.6 Splatting 74 60% 72.5 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 142GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 208 257 254 257 246 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	75.6% Very good	Read 362 Write 344 Mixed 309 SusWrite 254 71% 317 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 68.1 4K Mixed 34.3 127% 44.5 MB/s	DQ Read 186 DQ Write 105 DQ Mixed 133 103% 142 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 124%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 148GB free Firmware: A750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 131 142 144 145 138 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	82% Excellent	Read 148 Write 146 Mixed 32 SusWrite 138 84% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 137% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 103%
WD Elements 25A1 2TB 7,574 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1TB free, PID 25a1 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	12.6% Very poor	Read 32.6 Write 26.6 Mixed 25.8 SusWrite 10.4 31% 23.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 58%
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB 8,748 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 7GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 38 31 38 30 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	29.9% Poor	Read 137 Write 26.5 Mixed 27 SusWrite 34.7 58% 56.3 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 1.4 80% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 111%
TOSHIBA USB DRV 16GB 1,979 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 2GB free, PID 1400 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 10 10 10 9.9 11 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	7.5% Terrible	Read 24.6 Write 15.5 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 9.6 15% 13 MB/s	4K Read 6.5 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0 28% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.5% Great: 23%
TOSHIBA USB DRV 32GB 1,074 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 13GB free, PID 1400 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 6.8 6.4 6.4 7 7 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	6.71% Terrible	Read 30.4 Write 18.1 Mixed 18 SusWrite 7 22% 18.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.71% Great: 23%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23 12,481 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 14GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 26 26 21 10 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	19.6% Very poor	Read 36.6 Write 25.8 Mixed 29.3 SusWrite 21.6 37% 28.3 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 3.5 229% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 39%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB 7,719 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 2GB free, PID a81d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 5.7 6.1 5.9 6 6.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	5.32% Terrible	Read 19.8 Write 5.3 Mixed 0.3 SusWrite 5.7 8% 7.77 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.32% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.C8 017A 78.B1GE3.4010C 859B CT51264BA160BJ.C8 017A 78.B1GE3.4010C 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	60.7% Good	MC Read 22.2 MC Write 21.3 MC Mixed 19.1 60% 20.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 19.5 53% 18.5 GB/s	Latency 62.1 64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H77 Pro4-M Builds (Compare 186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H77 Pro4-M

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	36x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	28x
Core i5-3570KIntel $30Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	25x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	16x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	11x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $88Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	7x
X3 240GBTcsunbowBench 78%, 3,491 samples	7x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	6x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	6x
PSD38G13332 1x8GBPatriotBench 26%, 879 samples	4x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $585

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16