TYAN S5515

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardTYAN S5515  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121115
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 29 '19 at 22:53
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 86
2-Core 170
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 330
44% 330 Pts
64-Core 326
20% 326 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Intel(8086 2010) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2509
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.01% Terrible
Lighting 1.07
Reflection 1.54
Parallax 0.94
1% 1.18 fps
MRender 1.81
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2
1% 1.54 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.01%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
858GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 173 162 142 192 190 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 152
Write 212
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 168
101% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.9
352% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D3-55CK114SSV-999 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.8% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 14.8
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S5515 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: TYAN S5515

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback