Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190410
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 27 '19 at 23:57
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$429
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 92.2
1-Core 115
2-Core 230
83% 146 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 902
81% 681 Pts
64-Core 1,266
78% 1,266 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 89%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Nvidia(10DE 1B80) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2627 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Lighting 146
Reflection 153
Parallax 144
119% 148 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 143
Splatting 114
102% 126 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 111%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
413GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1213 842 840 842 841 846 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 2,015
Write 1958
Mixed 1,658
SusWrite 904
366% 1,634 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 64.4
223% 82 MB/s
DQ Read 908
DQ Write 802
DQ Mixed 850
638% 853 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 243%
Great: 297%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
918GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 443 440 448 449 449 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 485
Mixed 468
SusWrite 443
107% 476 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 97.2
4K Mixed 55.3
184% 64.4 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 355
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 121%
Great: 133%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
119GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 203 214 208 219 196 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 482
Write 209
Mixed 189
SusWrite 208
60% 272 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 57.8
4K Mixed 23.4
95% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 62.3
DQ Mixed 112
99% 156 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 76%
WD Blue 3D 500GB-$67
331GB free
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 404 407 410 410 412 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 451
Mixed 255
SusWrite 409
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 91.9
4K Mixed 41.3
158% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 210
194% 300 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 109%
Great: 117%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
930GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 85 87 88 91 90 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 92.5
Write 88.2
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 87.5
60% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 51%
USB DISK 2.0 4GB
2GB free, PID 1024
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.1 0.4 0.8 0.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
1.02% Terrible
Read 3
Write 2.5
Mixed 2
SusWrite 0.5
2% 2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
13% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.02%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AR32C16S8K2HU416R 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 25.9
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 24.8
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING Builds (Compare 15,819 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING - $339

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $1,267
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback