Performance Results

Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GM
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210823
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJul 17 '22 at 14:29
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 77
1-Core 114
2-Core 220
76% 137 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 441
49% 387 Pts
64-Core 442
27% 442 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1391) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
4.13% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 28.6
Parallax 6.8
5% 13.7 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 0.2
3% 4.4 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.13%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GB
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MA031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 89 136 148 143 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 406
Write 322
Mixed 332
SusWrite 130
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 33.2
4K Mixed 15.3
59% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 293
202% 249 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 3D 500GB-$81
346GB free
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 334 339 375 373 340 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 406
Write 374
Mixed 253
SusWrite 355
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 9.7
4K Write 29.4
4K Mixed 13.1
47% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 193
179% 277 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
47.2% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 13.6
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 15.5
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM Builds (Compare 1,225 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop 76%
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback