Asus PRIME Z370-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z370-A  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171101
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateAug 27 '19 at 23:19
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$110
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Memory 92
1-Core 114
2-Core 218
81% 141 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 443
57% 433 Pts
64-Core 452
28% 452 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Lighting 72.4
Reflection 71.3
Parallax 88.9
59% 77.5 fps
MRender 73
Gravity 68.7
Splatting 60.2
54% 67.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
379GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 72 76 72 77 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
66% Good
Read 222
Write 102
Mixed 331
SusWrite 121
44% 194 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 92.5
4K Mixed 29.2
123% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 194
170% 251 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 66%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
361GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 145 146 147 143 144 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 142
Write 74.2
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 145
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 113%
Toshiba MK6459GSXP 640GB
168GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 59 59 59 59 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 65.3
Write 62.5
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 58.6
37% 51.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 45%
Hitachi HCC 545032A7E380 320GB
65GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 39.2
Write 39.5
Mixed 33
SusWrite 40.5
28% 38 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C15 2x8GB-$65
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.4% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 22.1
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 22.8
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z370-A Builds (Compare 11,342 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370-A - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $947
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback