Asus Strix GL704GW_GL704GW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics49.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus Strix GL704GW_GL704GW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL704GW
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 25 '19 at 07:08
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
29.7% Poor
Memory 45.4
1-Core 24.7
2-Core 49.9
26% 40 Pts
4-Core 77.6
8-Core 120
12% 98.8 Pts
64-Core 165
10% 165 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1321) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.2
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.9% Average
Lighting 34.8
Reflection 53.2
Parallax 102
28% 63.3 fps
MRender 153
Gravity 101
Splatting 92.9
92% 116 fps
Poor: 58%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 99%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 8.3 9.3 9.3 8.4 8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 1,340
Write 11
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 8.3
72% 345 MB/s
4K Read 144
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.2
221% 49 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 113%
Great: 209%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
221GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 27 31 32 28 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
36% Below average
Read 378
Write 208
Mixed 281
SusWrite 32.3
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 17.2
4K Mixed 14.6
54% 16.3 MB/s
DQ Read 51
DQ Write 53.8
DQ Mixed 19.6
24% 41.5 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 36%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
39.3% Below average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 13.7
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 7.5
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 179
22% 179 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Strix GL704GW_GL704GW Builds (Compare 326 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: Asus Strix GL704GW_GL704GW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback