Asus Strix GL704GW_GL704GW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus Strix GL704GW_GL704GW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL704GW
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 25 '19 at 00:05
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
55% Above average
Memory 92.9
1-Core 24.9
2-Core 50.2
42% 56 Pts
4-Core 96
8-Core 161
16% 128 Pts
64-Core 181
11% 181 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 55%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1321) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.2
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.5% Above average
Lighting 42.7
Reflection 64.3
Parallax 102
35% 69.7 fps
MRender 156
Gravity 102
Splatting 92.9
93% 117 fps
Poor: 58%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 99%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 9.3 9.1 10 10 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 1,113
Write 10.7
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 9.8
60% 288 MB/s
4K Read 106
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 2.7
165% 36.6 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 209%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
224GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 30 23 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 446
Write 423
Mixed 314
SusWrite 28.9
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 12.6
4K Mixed 16
39% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 56.5
DQ Write 55.3
DQ Mixed 56.8
42% 56.2 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
46.5% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 13.9
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 13.1
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Strix GL704GW_GL704GW Builds (Compare 326 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: Asus Strix GL704GW_GL704GW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback