Asus Strix GL704GW_GL704GW

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	60.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	86.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Asus Strix GL704GW_GL704GW (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK GL704GW
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181217
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 24 '19 at 23:42
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	Memory 61.1 1-Core 24.9 2-Core 45 31% 43.7 Pts	4-Core 83.7 8-Core 146 14% 115 Pts	64-Core 198 12% 198 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile) 23,316 User benchmarks, average bench 88% Asus(1043 1321) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.2 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	60.2% Good	Lighting 52.7 Reflection 67.6 Parallax 119 43% 79.9 fps	MRender 159 Gravity 102 Splatting 93.9 94% 118 fps
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 99%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 11 10 10 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Read 1,103 Write 10.3 Mixed 17 SusWrite 10.4 59% 285 MB/s	4K Read 100 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 2.7 156% 34.7 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 209%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB 13,039 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 224GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 37 38 35 34 37 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	40.4% Average	Read 393 Write 388 Mixed 361 SusWrite 40.5 66% 296 MB/s	4K Read 15.4 4K Write 24.1 4K Mixed 20.4 62% 20 MB/s	DQ Read 57.2 DQ Write 56 DQ Mixed 56.2 42% 56.5 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GB 44,819 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	40.7% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 13.8 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 9.3 SC Mixed 8.3 22% 7.83 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Strix GL704GW_GL704GW Builds (Compare 326 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 63%

Destroyer

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 54%

Yacht

System: Asus Strix GL704GW_GL704GW

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	326x

GPU
RTX 2070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 88%, 23,316 samples	190x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	136x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	159x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	46x
XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBAdata $58Bench 279%, 85,928 samples	6x

RAM
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	66x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	32x
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 33,430 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16