Positivo POS-PIQ67CG

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPositivo POS-PIQ67CG  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo POS-PIQ67CG
Memory7.3 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 07 '19 at 23:52
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 83.9
2-Core 169
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 331
44% 327 Pts
64-Core 323
20% 323 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Lighting 38.5
Reflection 30.4
Parallax 36.6
31% 35.2 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 37.4
Splatting 35.1
30% 36.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000AVCS-6 500GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 34 30 24 23 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 86.3
Write 78.8
Mixed 47
SusWrite 26.9
44% 59.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 51%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
345GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 113 116 119 119 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 116
Write 118
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 118
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston SH564568FH8N0QNSCG 10GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.2% Below average
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 8.7
27% 9.37 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9.5
27% 9.47 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical POS-PIQ67CG Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo POS-PIQ67CG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $49
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback