Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	24.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-4600M APU 5,886 User benchmarks, average bench 43% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	43.5% Average	Memory 62.1 1-Core 25.3 2-Core 84.8 36% 57.4 Pts	4-Core 146 8-Core 145 20% 145 Pts	64-Core 142 9% 142 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660G 4,227 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Sanyo(144D C0DA) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.100.0.0 Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	5.16% Terrible	Lighting 6.5 Reflection 7.31 Parallax 5.81 5% 6.54 fps	MRender 5.52 Gravity 4.8 Splatting 7.13 5% 5.82 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.16% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 415GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 53 54 54 54 53 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.3% Poor	Read 222 Write 103 Mixed 100 SusWrite 53.1 26% 120 MB/s	4K Read 10.7 4K Write 15.1 4K Mixed 10 37% 11.9 MB/s	DQ Read 13.1 DQ Write 24.8 DQ Mixed 20.8 15% 19.6 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 102%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB 47,588 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 344GB free Firmware: 2AR10002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 53 54 54 54 53 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	41.6% Average	Read 92 Write 9.5 Mixed 40 SusWrite 53.3 36% 48.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.7 106% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905469-142.A00LF 9905469-142.A00LF 8GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 800, 800 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.5% Below average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 6.2 MC Mixed 11.3 31% 11 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 9.4 20% 7.07 GB/s	Latency 121 33% 121 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

RAM
M471B5273EB0-CK0 M471B5273EB0-CK0 8GBSamsungBench 28%, 329 samples	8x
CT102464BF186D.M16 CT8G3S186DM.C16FN 16GBUnknownBench 33%, 7 samples	4x
M471B5273DH0-CK0 M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GBSamsungBench 31%, 243 samples	4x

Value: 19% - Very poor

Total price: $27