Samsung 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemSamsung 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP355E7C-S05DE
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600x900x4294967296 szín, 1600x900x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 03 '19 at 22:40
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-4600M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Memory 80.4
1-Core 54.2
2-Core 89.1
49% 74.6 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 146
18% 139 Pts
64-Core 145
9% 145 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660G
Sanyo(144D C0DA) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
4.86% Terrible
Lighting 6.23
Reflection 7.31
Parallax 5.38
5% 6.31 fps
MRender 5.52
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 5.78
4% 5.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.86%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
422GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 93 96 97 96 96 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.6% Below average
Read 220
Write 171
Mixed 153
SusWrite 94.2
36% 160 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 32.2
4K Mixed 15.4
57% 20.3 MB/s
DQ Read 17.2
DQ Write 48.7
DQ Mixed 24
21% 30 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 102%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
379GB free
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 93 96 97 96 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 76.9
Write 46
Mixed 42.6
SusWrite 94.4
48% 65 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
99% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905469-142.A00LF 9905469-142.A00LF 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
33.6% Below average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 11.5
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 9.3
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $27
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback