Samsung 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemSamsung 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP355E7C-S05DE
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600x900x4294967296 szín, 1600x900x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 04 '19 at 11:15
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-4600M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Memory 79
1-Core 55.1
2-Core 64.1
46% 66.1 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 149
20% 147 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660G
Sanyo(144D C0DA) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
4.86% Terrible
Lighting 6.27
Reflection 6.65
Parallax 5.38
5% 6.1 fps
MRender 5.52
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 5.65
4% 5.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.86%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 87 91 89 89 96 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.3% Average
Read 166
Write 92.3
Mixed 182
SusWrite 90.3
30% 133 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 24.2
84% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 27
DQ Write 65.2
DQ Mixed 35.8
30% 42.7 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 102%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
379GB free
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 88 91 89 89 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 72.1
Write 53.1
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 90.8
48% 65.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
99% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905469-142.A00LF 9905469-142.A00LF 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
32.1% Below average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 10.7
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 9.3
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 18% - Very poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback