Asus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	30.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	218% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190618
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jul 05 '19 at 23:12
Run Duration	111 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	75.3% Very good	Memory 72.6 1-Core 108 2-Core 210 72% 130 Pts	4-Core 419 8-Core 692 68% 556 Pts	64-Core 853 53% 853 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.64 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	30.6% Below average	Lighting 38 Reflection 30.4 Parallax 36.7 31% 35 fps	MRender 37.8 Gravity 37.1 Splatting 35.4 30% 36.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 348GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1320 1147 609 608 605 607 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	218% Outstanding	Read 2,119 Write 1,919 Mixed 1,324 SusWrite 816 345% 1,544 MB/s	4K Read 50.9 4K Write 100 4K Mixed 67 216% 72.8 MB/s	DQ Read 419 DQ Write 301 DQ Mixed 393 285% 371 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 218% Great: 340%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2400 C15 4x4GB-$90 9,857 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	85.8% Excellent	MC Read 33 MC Write 31.4 MC Mixed 28.8 89% 31.1 GB/s	SC Read 20.7 SC Write 32.2 SC Mixed 26.8 76% 26.6 GB/s	Latency 95.6 42% 95.6 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 342 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	56x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	34x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	27x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	37x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	26x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	24x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	8x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	7x

RAM
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	14x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	9x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 105% - Outstanding

Total price: $290

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16